Showing posts with label early dementia diagnosis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label early dementia diagnosis. Show all posts

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Early Detection Alzheimer’s in Elderly Patients

Detecting Dementia

Making the diagnosis of dementia is reasonably straightforward in the moderate and severe stages, but it can be problematic to distinguish the early stages of Alzheimer’s from “normal” ageing in elderly patients, although recent development has helped to clarify which neuropsychological tests discriminate most effectively. Most people who present with concerns about memory problems do not in fact have dementia, and it is also important to note that in specialist clinical practice professionals see an atypical group of patients. O’Connor (1994) found that only 3% of people identified in a community survey as having mild dementia had been referred to specialist services, along with 18% of those with moderate dementia and 33% of those with severe dementia.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Early Detection

Interest in the early detection of Alzheimer’s has increased with the recent licensing of anti-cholinesterase inhibiting medication as a treatment for the cognitive impairment of early-stage Alzheimer’s. This detection on early-stage of the disease is increasingly undertaken in the context of multidisciplinary memory clinics, where neuropsychological assessment plays a critical role in establishing a diagnosis. Early detection of DAT offers the possibility of introducing psychosocial and pharmacological interventions at an early stage. It has been demonstrated that memory clinics can provide an effective focus for early intervention and for the development of integrated psychosocial approaches. Early detection of Alzheimer’s remains a challenge, however, and there are a number of barriers to early detection. People with dementia, and their families, may interpret certain memory impairment of the patients as part of normal ageing process or deny that there have been any changes, and rates of detection by general medical practitioners are low.

Distinguishing Dementia from “Normal” Ageing

The boundaries between dementia and normal forgetfulness still appear somewhat fluid, and it remains unclear how the difference between dementia and normal ageing should be conceptualized. Although many older people and their families expect to observe a decline in memory functioning, there is a great deal of variation in the general population as regards the kinds of memory changes seen as part of “normal” ageing, and the issue is compounded by cohort effects. A broad overview suggests that, although memory functioning becomes less efficient from about 67 years onwards there is no general decline in memory ability and no uniform decline across the range of different memory tasks. Memory functioning is relatively more affected in the very old, so that diagnostic criteria do not allow for a dementia diagnosis made after the age of 90. The following general observations can be made with regard to memory changes in healthy older people:
  • Working memory may be affected.
  • Episodic memory is affected to a much greater degree than semantic or procedural memory.
  • Immediate recall is affected more than delayed recall, while recognition memory is unaffected.
  • Retrieval is slower and less efficient, with more rapid and extensive forgetting.
  • Prospective memory remains as good as that of younger people if external aids and reminders can be used, but is poorer if no such aids are available.
  • Autobiographical memory does not show the stereotypical discrepancy between vivid memories of the distant past and hazy memories of more recent events; instead, memories across the lifespan show loss of detail and become vaguer.
  • Alterations in memory functioning can be offset by intelligence, expertise and use of compensatory strategies, enabling the person to cope well despite any changes.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

What is “Normal” Memory Loss?

  • Forgetting people’s names occasionally;
  • sometimes not being able to find the right word;
  • taking longer to learn new things;
  • sometimes forgetting where one has put things, like keys, for example;
  • sometimes forgetting what one has come into a room to do.

What are the Symptoms of More Serious Memory Loss?

A more serious memory problem is one that affect’s a person’s ability to carry out everyday life activities such as driving a car, shopping or managing money. Some of the signs are:
  • asking the same questions over and over;
  • getting lost in familiar places;
  • not being able to follow directions;
  • confusion over time, people and places;
  • forgetting to eat right and regularly;
  • not bathing;
  • poor judgment about safety;
  • driving problems.

Medicines That Cause Forgetfulness

Forgetfulness is common among drug and alcohol abusers, but certain medicines also list forgetfulness as one of their side effects. Due to the age-related medical conditions, elderly people are more affected by the negative side effects, caused by medications. Approximately 163,000 people in the United States are estimated to experience serious cognitive impairment either caused or worsened by drugs.

For example, a beta-blocker medication, such as Inderal, generic name propranolol, or Lopressor, generic name metoprolol, may cause short-term memory problems. Similar results have been reported in patients who use such medications which contain the active ingredient methyldopa. Additionally, many antidepressants cause memory-related problems, especially in the beginning of the treatment. The same applies to anti-anxiety medicines like lorazepam and alprazolam or sleeping pills like triazolam. Benzodiazepines that are used to treat such disorders as anxiety, restless legs and social phobias seem to cause forgetfulness. Tranquilizers that are used to treat such conditions as Tourette syndrome and irritable bowel syndrome also seem to cause forgetfulness in some patients. Some drugs aimed at reducing high levels of cholesterol have also been criticized for such side effects. Even over-the-counter medicines, such as the antihistamine diphenhydramine, have been linked to forgetfulness.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The Boundaries between Dementia and “Normal” Ageing

As a general rule, the lower the score on cognitive tests, the more likely it is that the person has dementia. However, Storandt & Hill (1989) found that scores of patients with very mild Alzheimer’s overlapped considerably with those of both normal older people and people with mild Alzheimer’s. Furthermore, even where people do show some degree of memory impairment, progression to dementia is not inevitable.

The area of uncertainty between “normal” ageing and dementia has attracted a number of attempts to define diagnostic categories. Among the diagnostic labels suggested are age-associated memory impairment (AAMI), mild cognitive impairment, benign senescent forgetfulness, and minimal or questionable dementia. These concepts remain controversial, and practice varies regarding their use. The category of AAMI, for example, would include large numbers of older people, and it is questionable whether changes that are essentially normative should be labeled in this way.

Which Tests Are Useful in Discriminating between Dementia and Normal Ageing?

The CERAD studies suggest that the best discriminator is performance on delayed recall tasks. A 10-word list presented in three learning trials and tested after a 5–8 min delay correctly classified 94% of controls and 86% of patients with mild dementia, using a cutting score of 2 SDs below the control group mean. Performance on naming tests was found to be useful as an adjunctive measure. If patients have impairment in delayed recall and problems in naming or verbal fluency, this is a very strong indicator for dementia. Other studies have also emphasized the value of delayed recall. Tierney et al. (1996) found that problems in delayed recall and attention were the best predictors of whether people with mild memory problems would go on to develop Alzheimer’s disease.


Sources and Additional Information:
The Book of Memory Disorders by Alan D. Baddeley


Saturday, February 12, 2011

Early Warning on Alzheimer’s through Spinal Fluid Tests

Early detection of the Alzheimer’s Disease is extremely important, since it may give an opportunity for the patients to take measures, delaying, or even conserving, for long the negative signs of the illness occurrence. Yes, there is no magical cure yet, but the medicine has already relatively efficient ways to offer ongoing maintenance measures to the patients. Detecting the disease at a very early stage, before the brain has suffered a lot of damage, may mean that treatments can be developed to stop the progression of disease. Current medications for Alzheimer’s, which are typically prescribed once memory impairment becomes obvious, may ease symptoms for a time but do nothing to stop the underlying disease.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The Scientists are making steady gains toward developing tests that can predict whether patients with mild cognitive difficulties or even no symptoms at all are likely to progress to full-blown Alzheimer’s disease. The latest research, published in August 2010 in the Archives of Neurology, a journal of the American Medical Association, found that a test of spinal fluid performed exceptionally well in identifying patients with Alzheimer’s or on the way to developing it.

Researchers have identified a protein "signature" in the spinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer's disease, which could represent an important advance in its diagnosis. The signature was found in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 90% of people with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and 72% of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) -- a disorder that often progresses to Alzheimer's.

Researchers measured concentrations of three proteins previously identified as potential biological indicators, or biomarkers, for Alzheimer's and MCI: amyloid-beta, tau, and phospho-tau. Low levels of the amyloid protein amyloid-beta 1-42, along with high levels of total tau and elevated phospho tau 181 (P-tau 181), identified Alzheimer's disease in three independent study groups, reports Hugo Vanderstichele, PhD, of the Belgian biotech company Innogenetics.

Along with colleagues from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, which paid for the research, Vanderstichele developed the protein profile and tested it on spinal fluid taken from roughly 100 older people with no evidence of memory loss, as well as 200 people with MCI and 100 with Alzheimer's disease. The researchers tested the samples without knowing the clinical status of the patients who supplied them.

The Alzheimer's signature was identified in nine out of 10 samples from patients with Alzheimer's disease and in just over two-thirds of patients with MCI. Thirty-six percent of people with no known cognitive impairment also exhibited the signature. These results were validated in CSF samples from two other studies. In one, the protein signature indicative of Alzheimer's was seen in 64 of 68 autopsy-confirmed cases of the disease. In another, all 57 patients with MCI followed for five years exhibited the protein profile.

It is not clear why more than a third of people without memory declines had the Alzheimer's biomarkers. It could be that the biomarker changes occur long before symptoms of Alzheimer's do, says neurologist John H. Growdon, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital. "These may be people who are able to tolerate a high burden of these toxic (proteins) without developing symptoms," he says.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

What is Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis?

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is a laboratory test to examine a sample of the fluid surrounding the brain and spinal cord. This fluid is a clear, watery liquid that protects the central nervous system from injury and cushions it from the surrounding bone structure. It contains a variety of substances, particularly glucose (sugar), protein, and white blood cells from the immune system. The fluid is withdrawn through a needle in a procedure called a lumbar puncture.

Precautions

In some circumstances, a lumbar puncture to withdraw a small amount of CSF for analysis may lead to serious complications. Lumbar puncture should be performed only with extreme caution, and only if the benefits are thought to outweigh the risks, in certain conditions. For example, in people who have blood clotting (coagulation) or bleeding disorders, lumbar puncture can cause bleeding that can compress the spinal cord. If there is a large brain tumor or other mass, removal of CSF can cause the brain to droop down within the skull cavity (herniate), compressing the brain stem and other vital structures, and leading to irreversible brain damage or death. These problems are easily avoided by checking blood coagulation through a blood test and by doing a computed tomography scan (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan before attempting the lumbar puncture. In addition, a lumbar puncture procedure should never be performed at the site of a localized skin infection on the lower back because the infection may be introduced into the CSF and may spread to the brain or spinal cord.

Description

The procedure to remove cerebrospinal fluid is called a lumbar puncture, or spinal tap, because the area of the spinal column used to obtain the sample is in the lumbar spine, or lower section of the back. In rare instances, such as a spinal fluid blockage in the middle of the back, a doctor may perform a spinal tap in the neck. The lower lumbar spine (usually between the vertebrae known as L4-5) is preferable because the spinal cord stops near L2, and a needle introduced below this level will miss the spinal cord and encounter only nerve roots, which are easily pushed aside.

A lumbar puncture takes about 30 minutes. Patients can undergo the test in a doctor's office, laboratory, or outpatient hospital setting. Sometimes it requires an inpatient hospital stay. If the patient has spinal arthritis, is extremely uncooperative, or obese, it may be necessary to introduce the spinal needle using x-ray guidance.

In order to get an accurate sample of cerebrospinal fluid, it is critical that a patient is in the proper position. The spine must be curved to allow as much space as possible between the lower vertebrae, or bones of the back, for the doctor to insert a lumbar puncture needle between the vertebrae and withdraw a small amount of fluid. The most common position is for the patient to lie on his or her side with the back at the edge of the exam table, head and chin bent down, knees drawn up to the chest, and arms clasped around the knees. (Small infants and people who are obese may need to curve their spines in a sitting position.) People should talk to their doctor if they have any questions about their position because it is important to be comfortable and to remain still during the entire procedure. In fact, the doctor will explain the procedure to the patient (or guardian) so that the patient can agree in writing to have it done (informed consent). If the patient is anxious or uncooperative, a short-acting sedative may be given.

During a lumbar puncture, the doctor drapes the back with a sterile covering that has an opening over the puncture site and cleans the skin surface with an antiseptic solution. Patients receive a local anesthetic to minimize any pain in the lower back.

The doctor inserts a hollow, thin needle in the space between two vertebrae of the lower back and slowly advances it toward the spine. A steady flow of clear cerebrospinal fluid, normally the color of water, will begin to fill the needle as soon as it enters the spinal canal. The doctor measures the cerebrospinal fluid pressure with a special instrument called a manometer and withdraws several vials of fluid for laboratory analysis. The amount of fluid collected depends on the type and number of tests needed to diagnose a particular medical disorder.

In some cases, the doctor must remove and reposition the needle. This occurs when there is not an even flow of fluid, the needle hits bone or a blood vessel, or the patient reports sharp, unusual pain.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Preparation

Patients can go about their normal activities before a lumbar puncture. Experts recommend that patients relax before the procedure to release any muscle tension, since the lumbar puncture needle must pass through muscle tissue before it reaches the spinal canal. A patient's level of relaxation before and during the procedure plays a critical role in the test's success.

Risks

For most people, the most common side effect after the removal of CSF is a headache. This occurs in 10-30% of adult patients and in up to 40% of children. It is caused by a decreased CSF pressure related to a small leak of CSF through the puncture site. These headaches usually are a dull pain, although some people report a throbbing sensation. A stiff neck and nausea may accompany the headache. Lumbar puncture headaches typically begin within two days after the procedure and persist from a few days to several weeks or months.

Since an upright position worsens the pain, patients with a lumbar puncture headache can control the pain by lying in a flat position and taking a prescription or non-prescription pain relief medication, preferably one containing caffeine. In rare cases, the puncture site leak is "patched" using the patient's own blood.

People should talk to their doctor about complications from a lumbar puncture. In most cases, this test to analyze CSF is a safe and effective procedure. Some patients experience pain, difficulty urinating, infection, or leakage of cerebrospinal fluid from the puncture site after the procedure.


Sources and Additional Information:


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...