Showing posts with label vaccines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccines. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Can Vaccination Reverse Alzheimer's Disease Symptoms?

Historical Development – Failed Attempts of Vaccine Development

Because beta-amyloid accumulations are prominent in the brains of individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD), scientists have sought treatments that would prevent the accumulation of beta-amyloid or remove it after it has accumulated. One approach is to immunize people against beta-amyloid through vaccination. Immunization would use the body's immune system to prevent the accumulation or promote the removal of beta-amyloid in the same way immunization for infectious agents such as tetanus, diphtheria, typhoid and polio prevents them from causing those illnesses. The vaccination concept is clear and well proven and there is some promising evidence from animal models of AD. However, developing a vaccine against beta-amyloid that is both safe and effective in humans is proving to be a substantial challenge.

In 1999, researchers reported that a vaccine called AN-1792 prevented formation of beta-amyloid plaques in young transgenic mice (mice genetically programmed to have specific characteristics) that develop many beta-amyloid plaques. They also found that when older mice with already formed beta-amyloid plaques were vaccinated with AN-1792, they had reductions in brain beta-amyloid. The next step was to determine whether reduction in beta-amyloid deposits improved "mouse memory" using standard models of memory in mice. The results were positive. Nevertheless, optimism was tempered by awareness that the mouse strain studied did not have neurofibrillary tangles. Many times studies in animal models do not generalize to human disease in terms of benefit, tolerability or both.

The first substantial trial of AN-1792 in humans resulted in symptoms of inflammation of the brain and spinal cord in enough patients that the study was stopped. The concept of vaccination against excessive accumulation of beta-amyloid remained promising and an aggressive research program on vaccination continued.

Later, in February 2004, a clinical trial testing a vaccination against Alzheimer's Disease was dealt another crushing blow when some of patients showed side effects of brain inflammation. The trial was stopped and it looked like the great hope of an Alzheimer's vaccine was lost.

The immunologists weren't to be beaten so easily. This trial has failed, but many scientists continued to believe that the human immune system can be trained to fight off Alzheimer's Disease by attacking the beta-amyloid peptide. This peptide is a short chain of amino acids (up to 42) like a molecular string of beads. When they are produced in the brain during Alzheimer's Disease the peptides all line up and stick together causing hard, microscopic chunks called amyloid plaques to appear in the brain. Many scientists believe that either the peptides themselves or the microscopic amyloid plaques actually cause the damage to the brains of patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The thinking goes that if an individual's immune system can be trained to attack the peptides (whether individually or in the plaques) then perhaps they will be protected against the damage the peptides may cause to the brain that leads to Alzheimer's.

At first it was thought that the vaccine worked by prompting the immune system to make antibodies that would actually get into the brain and attack the peptides where they lay. This may be the case, but the brain protects itself from invasion by preventing large molecules like antibodies from passing through the so called blood-brain barrier. Indeed, one of the first things you may expect to see if the brain were invaded in this way would be inflammation. More recent research has suggested that there may be an exchange of the peptides between the brain and the blood, so that if the antibodies in the bloodstream can attack the peptides here, more peptides will seep out of the brain only to be attacked themselves. If this is the case then the blood would be acting as a kind of waste disposal where the peptides would be destroyed and then more peptides fed in from the brain.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Clinical Research Development for Alzheimer’s Vaccine

University of California, Irvine, USA (2008)

A promising vaccine being tested for Alzheimer’s disease does what it is designed to do – clear beta-amyloid plaques from the brain – but it does not seem to help restore lost learning and memory abilities, according to a University of California, Irvine study.

The findings suggest that treating the predominant pathology of Alzheimer’s disease – beta-amyloid plaques – by itself may have only limited clinical benefit if started after there is significant plaque growth. However, a combination of vaccination with therapies that also target related neuron damage and cognitive decline may provide the best treatment opportunity for people with this neurodegenerative disease.

“We’ve found that reducing plaques is only part of the puzzle to treat Alzheimer disease,” said study leader, UC Irvine neurobiologist Elizabeth Head. “Vaccines such as this one are a good first step for effective Alzheimer’s treatment, but complimentary treatments must be developed to address the complexity of the disease.”

Head and colleagues studied for a two-year period in aging canines the effect of a vaccine that is currently under clinical development for treating patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The vaccine contains the beta-amyloid 1-42 protein and stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies against this same protein that is in the brain plaques. Dogs are used for such studies because beta-amyloid plaques grow naturally in their brains and they exhibit cognitive declines similar to those seen in humans.

After the aged dogs with beta-amyloid-plaque growth were immunized (which is similar to starting a treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease), the researchers found, in comparison with non-treated aged dogs, little difference in the results of behavioral tests that measure cognitive loss. Later, brain autopsies showed that although plaques had been cleared from multiple brain regions –  including the entorhinal cortex, a region of the brain involved with learning and memory and primarily affected by Alzheimer’s – damaged neurons remained.

Head said this discovery helps explain why there was little difference in the behavioral test results between immunized and nonimmunized dogs. In addition, she added, it implies that after clearing beta-amyloid plaques from the brain, the next step is to repair these neurons. This approach will be critical for treating and reversing the effects of the Alzheimer’s disease.

Currently, Head and her colleagues are developing approaches to repair these damaged neurons and hope to test them clinically.

University of Beersheva, Israel (2009)

An Israeli researcher working on a vaccine to combat Alzheimer's disease announced important progress following tests on gene-altered laboratory mice.

"We have been able to stimulate an immune response and forecast the effects in inoculated mice carrying human genes," Alon Monsonego, who works with British and U.S. researchers, told Agence France Presse.

"It is an important development" that could help find vaccines which could be used for individuals with a predisposition to Alzheimer's, said the University of Beersheva researcher.

Monsonego added that "inoculated mice were able to reduce plaques of beta-peptides, as well as inflammations and neuronal damage associated with the disease."


Image and video hosting by TinyPic


Industrial Research Development for Alzheimer’s Vaccine

Araclon Biotech, Spain (2009)

Araclon Biotech has obtained its first European Patent for a vaccine therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. The company hopes to start the regulatory pre-clinical development of the vaccine this year, with the aim of starting clinical trials on humans at the end of 2010.

The conclusions obtained concerning toxicity and efficacy in the animal models used has encouraged the company’s high expectations for future clinical results. Receiving the patent in the European Union, granted by the European Patent Office is a big break for the company’s ambitious project.

Does this step mean that this remedy can be used? No, not yet. Until now, researchers, led by Dr. Manuel Sarasa, Professor of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology of the University of Zaragoza, have used animal models, mainly dogs. “Dog reproduces quite well Alzheimer’s injuries in human beings and because of that we chose it”, Pilar de la Huerta, Araclon Biotech executive advisor, pointed out.

“This is the first vaccine developed in Spain as a therapy for this disease and one of the few in the world”, Sarasa, who has been studying Alzheimer for twenty years, added.

However, although it is very difficult to foresee the efficiency that this therapy will have in human beings, the truth is that in animal experimentation it is 100%.

To achieve this, several antibodies, which have led to this vaccine, were developed and patented. At the moment, researchers are very optimistic with the future. ‘Other companies have developed vaccines that, when they passed to the testing-in-humans phase, were effective but toxic, so they could not be used’ - Pilar de la Huerta explains -. ‘Nonetheless, our studies show that this one, at the moment, is not”.

Professor Sarasa’s last discoveries show that Amyloid-Beta protein, which is related to the disease, is not only in senile plaques but also in neurofibrillary tangles. The objective of the vaccine is to go directly to the molecule, which is considered the cause of the disease, and reduce its levels. This is a bet to the detriment of other solutions as enzymes inhibiting therapies.

On the other hand, this team thinks that the mistake of previous researches to heal the disease has been that they chose persons who already had the problem. Because of that, they want to begin testing with healthy volunteers.

Affiris, Austria (2010)

An Austrian biotechnology company, Affiris, has brought its new vaccine (AD02) through the first testing phase in which it was shown to be safe and relatively free of intolerable side effects. The new vaccine is designed to be therapeutic and is aimed at helping those who are already in the throes of Alzheimer’s.

Slightly more than 400 volunteer patients are being recruited for the second phase testing of the new vaccine. This next-step testing will be in several European countries. The tests will be for vaccine effectiveness; that is, efficacy in the mitigation of the disease rather than for its prevention. Results may be available as soon as 2012.

Alzheimer’s attacks the brain by way of buildup of amyloid plaques. Those plaques cause nerve cell damage and the consequent loss of brain function. The AD02 vaccine causes production of antibodies which counter plaque production by attacking the beta-amyloid protein that is at or near the center of plaque formation.

An Affiris representative has asserted that, should the AD02 vaccine be therapeutically successful, the technology used in its development as a therapeutic tool could also be applied to the development of a vaccine for prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease in healthy individuals.



Sources and Additional Information:

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Mercury Contributes To Alzheimer's Disease!

"You wouldn’t take a leaky thermometer, 
put it in your mouth, and leave it there 24 hours a day, 
365 days a year. Yet that’s exactly what happens 
when an amalgam filling is installed in your mouth."


Dr Michael Ziff




Link between Mercury and Alzheimer’s Disease
Research conducted at the University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine has demonstrated that trace amounts of mercury can cause the type of damage to nerves that is characteristic of the damage found in Alzheimer’s Disease. The level of mercury exposure is consistent with those levels found in humans with mercury/silver amalgam dental fillings. The exposure to mercury caused the formation of “neurofibrillar tangles,” which are one of the two diagnostic markers for Alzheimer’s Disease.

The scientists found that other metals, including aluminum, did not cause the damage. Previous research has shown that mercury can cause the formation of the other Alzheimer’s Disease diagnostic marker, “amyloid plaques.”

This study should remove all doubt regarding the role that dental mercury from amalgam fillings plays in the development of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Although the American Dental Association would like to have you believe otherwise, science has clearly demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between brain mercury levels and the number and surfaces of “mercury/silver” amalgam dental fillings. The mercury levels that caused the devastating damage to nerve cells in the above referenced study were 100 to 1000 times below those found in the brains of people with “mercury/silver” amalgam dental fillings.

In 1997, researchers at the University of Calgary Medical School and the College of
Pharmacy at the University of Kentucky clearly demonstrated that exposing rats to the same levels of mercury vapor that can be released from “mercury/silver” amalgam dental fillings caused the mercury to interact with brain tubulin and disassemble microtubles that maintain neurite structure. The identical neurochemical lesion of similar or greater magnitude is evident in Alzheimer brain homogenates from approximately 80% of patients, when compared to human age-matched neurological controls.

In 2000, researchers at the Neurobiology Laboratory, Psychiatric University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland using neuroblastoma cells exposed to mercury demonstrated an increase in production of amyloid protein that makes up the amyloid plaques as well as significantly increasing the phophorylation of Tau protein.

Mercury Sources
Major human sources of mercury in the human bodies include fish consumption, dental amalgams and vaccines. Methyl mercury in fish, being bound to cysteine, appears to be by far less toxic than hitherto assumed and is about 20 times less toxic than methyl mercury chloride. For that reasons, methyl-mercury found in fish seems not to be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Inorganic mercury (found in dental amalgam) or ethyl-mercury (found in vaccines) may play a major role.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Dental amalgam, the silver fillings dentists use, is by far the biggest culprit of mercury poisoning and the biggest reason for Alzheimer's and dementia in the world today.

According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals): “If an individual has had 5 consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's Disease is 10 times higher than if he/she had one, 2 or no shots”. Dr. Fudenberg said it was so and that it was due to mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot. The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. Flu shots contain 25 micrograms of mercury. One microgram is considered toxic.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"The maximum amount of mercury that the Environment Protection Agency allows people to be exposed to is 5,000 times smaller than the permissible amount of lead exposure; in other words the EPA apparently considers mercury to be 5,000 times more toxic than lead."
Marcia Basciano DDS at annual meeting of IAOMT San Diego 1994

Estimates of amounts of mercury absorbed from amalgams
That amalgams can double the body's mercury level and triple the urine's mercury level suggests that mercury from amalgams is the source of at least half to two-thirds of all the mercury humans are exposed to. Over the last four or five years, a substantial body of evidence has emerged which indicates that most of the mercury absorbed by people in industrial nations comes from their amalgam fillings.\

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

In 1991 the World Health Organization...... concluded the daily dose of mercury from the environment is 2.6 ug......... If the correct figure for absorption of mercury from amalgam turns out to be 8 ug, then the total mercury absorbed per day from all sources -- the environment plus amalgam -- is 10.6 ug, according to the WHO data. This means amalgam mercury constitutes three-fourths of all mercury absorbed by the body (8 ug is 75% of 10.6 ug). If 10 ug turns out to be the correct figure for mercury taken up from amalgams, then the total absorbed is 12.6, which means about four-fifths of all mercury absorbed comes from amalgams (10 ug is 79% of 12.6 ug).

In a 1995 report prepared for Health Canada (Canada's national health department), Richardson estimated that amalgam mercury constitutes half of the mercury absorbed daily by adult Canadians.

Whether amalgam mercury is the source of 50% of all mercury absorbed, as Richardson's data indicates, or three-fourths, as the WHO data suggests, mercury from amalgams contributes a substantial portion of the mercury absorbed each day, not a "very small" portion as the ADA would have the public believe.

Alzeimer’s symptoms and Mercury poisoning
A large body of research on the effect of accidental mercury poisoning indicates that mercury causes emotional and mental disturbances very similar to those that appear in many AD victims. Here is a summary of the emotional and mental symptoms commonly associated with AD: Patients with Alzheimer's exhibit changes in personality and social skills. They . . . may become socially uninhibited or lose all initiative and interest in activities. These patients often have delusions, hallucinations, and sleep disorders. They sometimes show grossly inappropriate judgment and sometimes are misdiagnosed as being depressed or psychotic.

Every one of these symptoms is common symptoms of mercury poisoning.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

AD as an inflammatory response
The hypothesis that AD is caused by mercury from amalgam and the environment is consistent with the theory that AD is an inflammatory disease caused by the body's reaction to an infection or environmental insult. The evidence that AD "fits the paradigm of the idiopathic rheumatic disorders" was recently presented by Aisen and Davis.

"According to this model," wrote the authors, "an unknown set of circumstances results in an initial insult triggering an inflammatory reaction in the brain. The inflammation becomes self-propagating, or it continues because the obscure inciting factors persist." They argue that the acute phase response may augment production of beta-amyloid, the protein found among the plaques in AD brains. They conclude that "cytokines, acute phase proteins, activated microglia, and complement," all mechanisms which can be triggered by the acute phase response of the immune system, are "involved" with AD, either as causes or consequences, and that anti-inflammatory drugs may "alter" the progression of AD. Mercury may well be one of the "obscure inciting factors" that triggers the inflammatory response.

Some direct evidence that anti-inflammatory drugs may delay the onset of AD already exists. McGeer et al. reported data suggesting that "the prevalence of Alzheimer disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is unexpectedly low and that [the use of] anti-inflammatory therapy might be the explanation."


Sources and Additional Information:
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...